The fake 100%
AI wrote every sentence. You can read it back, but you can't explain the decision behind it.
vera checks your work against the assessment criteria, then asks the questions that prove you understand it. It never writes it for you.
Give vera a job
Check my draft. Every criterion gets a standing and the line from your draft behind it.
Quality Guard checks your work against the actual criteria, then checks the part no rubric can see: your understanding.
Bring the work you already have. No blank-page theatre.
Every criterion gets a standing and the line from your draft behind it.
Explain the choices behind the words, in your own voice.
Leave knowing where the work is strong and what still needs thought.
Pricing advice · draft 3 · example
Your advice follows from the strongest finding: off-peak visits rise when the price stays put.
One source so far. The criteria ask for three, at least two peer-reviewed.
You don't say when your advice would fail. Name one risk and how you'd test it.
Why does off-peak demand rise if willingness to pay doesn’t? Answer in your own words.
The course context stays with the work, so the coaching gets specific without doing the thinking for you.
Export your module from Canvas and drop the file into vero. The materials and assessment criteria come with it.
Get coached step by step. vera asks the question that moves your thinking and never hands you the answer.
Prove you understand the work before you submit it, present it or defend it in class.
AI can make weak understanding look polished. That works right until somebody asks the next question.
AI wrote every sentence. You can read it back, but you can't explain the decision behind it.
It sounds smart until a teacher asks “why?” and the polished language stops helping.
You crammed enough to submit, not enough to remember. The next course starts from zero again.
I keep passing modules and then panicking before exams, because I actually remember almost none of it.
I can write a decent answer and still be parroting the slides. Nobody checks if I can say it out loud.
I study the night before, it works just enough to pass, and by Monday the whole module is gone.
Waitlist data is your email and what you tell us. It stays in Supabase's EU region and a private sheet, and we delete it on request.
Checkpoints check understanding. vero. never writes your submissions for you.
Course files you add are only used for your own feedback. Never shared, never used to train models.
Just a study tool designed around the moment where knowing becomes visible.
No. vero. is built to make you do more thinking, not less. It coaches from your own course materials and uses checkpoints to check that you understand what you submit. It never writes your work.
ChatGPT starts with a blank conversation. vero. stays grounded in your course and its assessment criteria, then asks you to defend the reasoning instead of handing you polished text.
vera is the study coach inside vero. It reads your draft against the criteria, tells you where each one stands, and asks questions back instead of writing for you.
HU Creative Business students. We start with one programme so the course context is right, then widen from there.
The first cohort opens in waves. Join the list and we'll email you when your spot is ready.
Pricing isn't set yet. Early users see the plan before they commit, so there's no surprise paywall after setup.
Your waitlist details are stored in Supabase’s EU region and a private sheet, and we delete them on request. Read how we handle your data.
No. vero. is an independent project built by an HU student. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by Hogeschool Utrecht.
Join the first cohort of HU Creative Business students learning to use AI without outsourcing their understanding. Onboarded in waves.